Washington, D.C. – The United States has officially proposed a 30-day ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine in a significant diplomatic effort to de-escalate the ongoing war. The ceasefire proposal was a key focus of recent talks in Saudi Arabia, where US officials worked to broker a temporary truce. While Ukraine has agreed to the plan, Russia has yet to issue a formal response.
US Calls for Immediate Ceasefire to Prevent Further Escalation
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized the importance of the ceasefire proposal, stating that immediate action is necessary to halt violence and prevent further humanitarian crises. Washington has also announced the restoration of intelligence-sharing and security assistance to Ukraine, a move aimed at reinforcing its position in peace negotiations.
Ukraine Backs the Ceasefire, Urges Russia to Participate
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed strong support for the 30-day ceasefire, urging Russia to engage in talks that could lead to long-term peace. Ukrainian officials stressed that even a temporary cessation of hostilities could facilitate humanitarian aid efforts and set the stage for a more comprehensive resolution.
Russia’s Response Remains Uncertain Amid International Pressure
Despite mounting global support for the ceasefire agreement, Russia has yet to formally accept or reject the proposal. Some Russian officials have hinted that Moscow may set conditions before agreeing to a temporary truce, raising concerns over potential delays in diplomatic progress.
The 30-day ceasefire proposal has received strong backing from European nations and the United Nations, with many leaders viewing it as a critical step toward reducing tensions. However, analysts warn that without a structured negotiation process, this truce may only serve as a short-term solution.
As international efforts continue, the world awaits Russia’s response, hoping that this ceasefire initiative will mark the beginning of a broader peace process. The success of this agreement will ultimately depend on Moscow’s willingness to commit to meaningful diplomatic engagement.
